Thursday, 25 February 2010

See my award-winning shot - now in official Spider Gallery

I announced a while ago that Haystack and Tracks reached nominee status, one step before winner, in the 5th Annual Black and White Spider Awards...

Official Notification

Well, yesterday I got an email from the Awards Team giving me the official Nominee Button, telling me that my Nominee shot is now in their official gallery and that my certificate would be sent in the post sometime in April

Great news and it gave me such a lift. I'll definitely be framing and hanging the certificate in pride of place on the wall!

Haystack and Tracks
Black and White Spider Awards Nominee Button



You can buy cards, posters and canvases featuring this image from my online store...



comments / critique / feedback always welcome :)

Labels: , , , , , ,

Add to Google StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!

Tuesday, 26 January 2010

Wowee! I made it as a nominee in the 5th Annual Spider B&W Awards!!

I was dumbfounded to find out I made it to nominee status in the 5th Annual Spider B&W Awards!!

Haystack and Tracks

I'm over the moon about it because the winners get chosen from the "nominees". Here is the image, it got chosen for the Nature category:


Haystack and Tracks

...and here is the Spider Awards page it's on.

I didn't get chosen as a winner though :( so that means I just got pipped at the post! but who cares? A nominee! Woohoo!!

comments / critique / feedback always welcome :)

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Add to Google StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!

Saturday, 23 January 2010

A Dartmoor pony in the wild

As promised a few posts ago [@Shadow: happy now? :-)]

Dartmoor in thaw

Here's a shot of a Dartmoor pony in the wild, taken on my recent trip up onto Dartmoor.

These ponies run free for most of the year and, even though considered "wild", they still belong to the various farmers on the moors. Every year they have a foal roundup and allot the new foals to the correct herds/farms.


Dartmoor Pony in the wild

Lighting conditions were difficult in this shot. It was during the start of the thaw from all the recent snow in the UK and the air had a very clear crisp quality. In the bright sunlight, even though the sun was quite low in the sky, it lead to very contrasty shooting conditions for black and white, too much even for my tastes—besides, it was in all the wrong places!

So, I finally did battle in the digital darkroom and eventually (after two sessions!!) tamed and bent the lighting to my will. I hope you like the finished shot :)

comments / critique / feedback always welcome :)

Labels: , ,

Add to Google StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!

Saturday, 16 January 2010

The snow is retreating

Here's another shot from my trip to the moors the other day.

It's all melting

A little frost was left in the areas sheltered from the worst of the snow. A little way off you can see the snow still lying in the more exposed spots.


River on Lee Moor

This was taken heading from Cornwood up towards Lee Moor. It's quite typical of the rivers of the moors here in Devon when they pass through a fold or contour of land. This gives the shelter that allows the trees to grow in the otherwise exposed, inhospitable landscape of the wind-swept moors.

comments / critique / feedback always welcome :)

Labels: , ,

Add to Google StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!

Monday, 14 December 2009

The Photgraphic Aspect - Mark Alan Meader

Short and sweet this time...

Mark Alan Meander

...has produced a stunning bw image: In The Twilight Zone, which you can see on his blog

It's a beautiful quality of light and there's so much interest in the shot. The lead-in and leading lines take your eyes through a journey of gorgeous texture, contrast, light and shade. Exquisite!

I've seen so much that is good but, sadly, not astonishing, lately that it's kind of deflated the creative urge in me. But this image from Mark has picked me right up again. Thanks Mark!

comments always welcome :)

Labels: , ,

Add to Google StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!

Wednesday, 11 November 2009

Photography composition tips

As promised a while ago, here are some rules on composition you need to know about. As usual, half the skill comes in knowing when to apply them and when to turn a blind eye.

The rule of thirds

..is a useful one. It says that you divide the image into a grid, jut like the one below. Then, when you're composing your shot, you place significant items along / up any of those lines. Horizons are easy, place on the lower line for an airy feel, on the upper line for a more closed-in feel.

Put your main subject somewhere where two lines cross and you'll boost its power, its dominance in the shot. Have a look at the following images.

In Firefox (others?), you can drag the grid and slide it on top of the images here (let go and it'll pop back). Look at what it tells you about where I've placed the various elements in these compositions. You'll notice things don't have to be exact—near the lines / crossing-points works too, I think you'll agree.






Lead-in lines

As it says on the tin... lines that lead the eye in and guide the viewer to your main subject. It can be a hit-you-in-the-face, straight shooting line like here (and in the piccies above) or it can be a meandering line that takes you to various points in the image, before continuing to the next.



Foreground interest


If you have a shot that takes in a lot of distance that also includes the foreground, then you need something to initially grab the viewer's interest and bring them into the rest of the shot. And that's what foreground interest is. Without that bundle of paper, or the post on the beach, those shots would lose a lot of power.

Distractions

Well, I haven't got any examples from my work for this heading! I'm always very careful with distractions (a bit of a pedant actually!). So what do I mean? Well there's a couple of things that fit here. (I'm assuming here you're past the point of shooting people with telegraph poles sticking out their heads!)

First Contrasting areas near the edge of the frame. For example, if you have mainly dark borders with a light blob next to the image edge, then the viewer's eyes will be pulled right to that blob and then likely right out the picture. Even if they're looking in the body of the image, as soon as their eyes get anywhere near that blob, bang, they'll be drawn right to it. Or maybe it's a tree branch sticking its nose in, or some other distraction intruding into the frame.

Second For example, one or two birds that are just dots in the sky (or maybe there's one or to spots of chewing gum on the pavement in a street scene). If the sky is uniform and those dots contrast against it, again the viewer's eyes will notice. But once their attention is drawn, there's nothing but dirty smudges to see. Sorry, they've got to go. A stray crisp bag, one corner poking into the scene from under a bush?—get rid of it.

Simplicity

If there's no good reason to include something in your shot, don't! Of course, when you're shooting from the hip because there's lots going on, well, the finer points go right out the window then anyway.

For other situations, those where you have more time and control, simplify, simplify and simplify again. Ok, again these are extreme examples, but they serve to illustrate.



Another example, say you're taking a macro (close-up) shot of some mushrooms under a tree. Remove any stray twigs, leaves or other detritus—it's mushrooms you're photographing after all!

Height

Don't always shoot standing up. Varying the height from which you shoot can have a huge impact on the final shot. Shooting kids / pets? Get down to their eye level, get below it if you can. Shoot a worm's eye view of a scene, getting as close to the ground as you can. Jump up on a wall to introduce foreshortening or just to get interesting lines.



In a nutshell

Place important elements along those powerful thirds' lines / intersections. Consider how to bring the viewer's eye into the picture, look for what can serve as lead in lines and / or foreground interest. Have a quick glance around for distractions and watch out for areas of high contrast along the frame edges.

Next steps

Use and abuse these rules the next time you get the chance. Try to get a feel for which compositional approach suits each scene you take a fancy to. Walk a few steps in each direction from the first viewpoint you naturally gravitate towards. See how any possible lead-in lines change their relationship with the scene as you move. Crouch down, step up high, look for foreground interest.

...and let me know how you get on, post a link in the comments. I'm looking forward to seeing how you get on.


comments / critique / feedback always welcome :)

Labels: , , , , , ,

Add to Google StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!

Thursday, 3 September 2009

Pony Triptych final layout

After a lot of trying different combinations I've finally settled on the one.

Vertical emphasis

Grazing With Light

I chose the vertical format for the triptych, as first suggested by Kitty (who, by coincidence, was also one of the three prize winners for August). The nature of each shot is vertical, both by orientation and composition. When the triptych is laid out vertically, it takes on a very commanding presence, as I'm sure you'll agree.

I've chosen a balanced sequence that goes for a top-to-bottom flow and a title which is both observational and describes the sculpting approach I used—a pun always helps :) 

I've managed to avoid the question of naming the individual images while I've been concentrating on the triptych and sorting out the August prize draw but I'll need to return to that next. But first I have to work out and post some new rules for the September draw, ones which mean I don't lose a whole day actually making the draw, like I did this time!

comments / critique / feedback always welcome :)

Labels: , , ,

Add to Google StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!

Tuesday, 21 April 2009

Exploring the thought that I treat my images like poems

A painter who visited my work asked:
The hay stacks - a lot of atmosphere in this pic - wonder if you see your photos as poems (reading it on different levels?)
I said in my reply that it was an interesting topic that I'd explore some more in my blog. The short answer is - yes, often, sometimes more so, sometimes less.

So here goes with the long answer

First, a couple of concepts I'll be relying on. Beware, I'm not formally trained so might not use the right words but hopefully I'll get my meaning across. [Amusing mixing of levels, here: Note to self, a picture paints a thousand words, so why don't I use a photo to express what I mean? Oh, I'm going to, don't get ahead of yourself!]

Meaning

Interpretation and subsequent meaning is in the eye of the beholder - if the beholder is a cat, don't expect the meaning you derive to be the same as the cat's (unless, of course, you happen to be a cat reading this).

Two humans would likely agree on key aspects but even then, differences between them (some from nurture, some from nature - and think synesthesia here for an extreme example) will lead to differences in impression. Some will "get" connections that are implicit in the work more quickly than others.

Levels

Levels appear in many contexts; for example, between a subtle pun in the title chosen for the piece and elements of the piece itself.

A good example of this is the haystacks work above. Its title is Hay303 Stacks and if you care to look, you'll find it explained that this was taken on the UK road, the A303. Ok, you see what I did there. But there's also a hint of something else - there are three haystacks on the skyline and the fields are razed to the ground, barren (=0). There's lots more subtlety in there but that's all from me about it, there's got to be some mystery!


This one has the title One, Two Three - Snow! (rhymes with the way we started races when I was a kid - "one, two, three, go!" so there are echoes of childhood simplicity mixed up with image simplicity). AND there's also the one road, two pavements (sidewalks) and three objects - or one lampost (also = the digit "1"), two squares, three surfaces.

Back to the poem question

To me anyway, a poem has certain characteristics before you get to the actual words used and their meaning. The meter / rhythm, the inner structure (how many syllables to a line, how many lines to a stanza) and the overall structure of how many stanzas. (In simplest terms, anyway, and from a non-poet's viewpoint.)

These are like the compositional elements in a photo before you get to the actual content itself. They equate in some sense to the viewpoint taken, the framing of the elements and their form and spacial inter-relationships within that frame.

In photos you have the main subject and in poetry the main theme. A poet then carefully chooses words to convey the meaning felt by them during that part of the work, possibly using the rhythm to reinforce but also phrasing things and choosing sound-shapes to bring other echoes to the mind of the reader / listener, as befits the meaning intended. And then they polish, polish and polish some more.

I think I do the equivalent with my photos once I get them to the digital darkroom. For example, in choosing the colour to mono conversion technique to use, I'm building on what tonal relationships -- in and between the elements -- to play up or down, polishing what happenstance put before me and I arranged in the viewfinder. Another example is Knot A Rope Knot - notice there's a rope (knot) sandwiched between two knots on the wooden post.

So with both poems and pictures (and, if you think about music, with that too) artistic expression is about creating a work that encapsulates a piece of the artist's world-view. More than that, to be considered "worthy", it has to survive the translation through their chosen medium to become the observer's impression. And if the same meaning as was intended is felt, then it has worked.

Of course, the observer always has the chance to mis-, over- or re-interpret, and if that results in more than the artist consciously intended ...then all to the good! Either it was there and intended or it was there as an artefact of something else but, nevertheless, still artist-inspired.

How well it is appreciated depends on the inner creation envisaged by the artist in the first place, how well the artist packages that up in their piece, how accurately this piece is perceived and interpreted by the observer and how much their interpretation then appeals to their sense of beauty.


So, finally...

...I think that pretty much anyone consciously "doing art" whether they be poet, painter, musician or whatever, weaves an expression of their art using all the strands available (including multi and mixed levels), that they think are relevant and that have meaning in their chosen medium.

Labels: , ,

Add to Google StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!