Neighbours - a social comment
I was staying at a friends a while back in their beautiful new home. It's in a development on what was Ipswich's war-time airport and in their back garden, I was struck by how isolating these spaces are.
Some would say it's for privacy, and I guess that view has some merit. I just question the totality of it. I think that much more usual, and what I'm more used to, is hedges, low fences and walls, where you can still see your neighbour's space if you make a little effort—you know, crane your neck, trim the hedge, pick weeds out the wall. That way, it's still private, but not entirely off-cutting.
By this I mean that the out-of-sight, out-of-mind syndrone exists. You know, the SEP field generator used by Slarty Bartfast (Hitch-hikers Guide To The Galaxy) to hide his spaceship (SEP field—a field that works on the Somebody Else's Problem principle— if it's somebody else's problem, it hits your slippery-shouldered blind spot, where your subconscious knows it can safely ignore the existence of the thing and so you just don't see it).
So this image is a social comment about the slow destruction of real-world community by the treatment of people by large organisations as repeating homogeneous units, where one is the same as the next.
How you read the image is up to you—there's certainly heavy overtones of regimented uniformity; suppressed uniqueness, enforced uniformity—the way our personalities are wrapped up into little indistinguishable boxes.
comments / critique / feedback always welcome :)
Stumble It!
Too much privacy?
Some would say it's for privacy, and I guess that view has some merit. I just question the totality of it. I think that much more usual, and what I'm more used to, is hedges, low fences and walls, where you can still see your neighbour's space if you make a little effort—you know, crane your neck, trim the hedge, pick weeds out the wall. That way, it's still private, but not entirely off-cutting.
By this I mean that the out-of-sight, out-of-mind syndrone exists. You know, the SEP field generator used by Slarty Bartfast (Hitch-hikers Guide To The Galaxy) to hide his spaceship (SEP field—a field that works on the Somebody Else's Problem principle— if it's somebody else's problem, it hits your slippery-shouldered blind spot, where your subconscious knows it can safely ignore the existence of the thing and so you just don't see it).
So this image is a social comment about the slow destruction of real-world community by the treatment of people by large organisations as repeating homogeneous units, where one is the same as the next.
How you read the image is up to you—there's certainly heavy overtones of regimented uniformity; suppressed uniqueness, enforced uniformity—the way our personalities are wrapped up into little indistinguishable boxes.
comments / critique / feedback always welcome :)
Labels: abstract, architecture, introspective, photojournalism


7 Comments:
Hmmm interesting post!! There are alot of communities here like that too. Loved the sci fi reference!!!
I live in an older part of town - a garden district. We too have begun to see some huge privacy walls go up. I kind like the hedge..where I can chat with my neighbors a bit. Great shot!!!
Sarah
As we moved to this place about three weeks ago, still have to learn about our neighboors. My small son seems to be best doing it, as he runs into their yards, doors etc. - wish as an adult I would have that less fear.
Please have a nice weekend.
A very thoughtful post, and a great image. Where I live in the US, there are no fences or hedges between houses, but because everyone is busy away from home or inside the home, we do not get to know our neighbors like we would if we could converse over the back wall... :(
Great shot!
Interesting post. I've seen these "privacy fences" before. They make the place look like a fort! I like wide-open spaces with no fences. I'm lucky, in our neighborhood, no one has a privacy fence.
Never seen a privacy fence quite like this. A bit garish, obtrusive. but fits the bill of SEP. I felt sorry for poor hapless Arthur Dent.
The repetitive pattern is quite pleasing with an angle element to add that touch of surprise.
you also touched on something, "repeating homogeneous units". This not only applies to our urban and suburban homes to close people out, but to create dull and lifeless dining areas as well. here in the suburbs, we are plagued with chain restaurants, and I'm not talking about the McFast food shops.
They all look the same, same crap cluttering the walls, same color schemes, same building design, same food same repetitive patterns. I think it appeased the dulled creativity of living in suburbia.
Wow, what a social commentary of suburban life!
Cheers for all the feedback folks and for sharing what it's like where you live.
@DL: hmmm, we have the same with the chains we have here in the uk - Hungry Horse to name but one. The order of the day for these types of place is the same menu, the same acceptable-but-only-just food, the same treatment as "just another customer" by the staff. :(
What we want is the uniqueness of "The Restaurant At The End Of The Universe" in all our eateries :)
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home